Europcar investors left empty-handed after 'textbook short squeeze' on CDS


A technical quirk has rendered derivatives linked to the defaulted debt of a French rental car company worthless, in the latest embarrassing incident to hit the $9tn credit default swaps market.

Buyers of CDS on Europcar were expecting a payout to compensate them for the company failing to honour its debt. But an auction held on Wednesday to determine the level of award left them with nothing.

The farce marks the latest in a string of mishaps that have undermined confidence in CDS — derivatives that are intended to act like insurance against a borrower reneging on its debts.

With corporate collapses expected to pick up across Europe this year, as widespread government support schemes come to an end, the incident exposes the pitfalls for debt investors looking to protect themselves against losses.

Europcar defaulted on its debt as part of a financial restructuring struck at the end of last year. Less than $100m of CDS is directly tied to the company but the shock resolution to the CDS claims triggered a sharp move in the iTraxx Crossover index that is widely used as a credit hedging tool.

The problem stemmed from the terms of Europcar's restructuring, which meant that most holders of its €1bn bonds were restricted from trading, preventing the debt from being included in the crucial auction that determined the swap payout.

This wrongfooted many investors and traders, who had earlier expected technicalities to play in their favour and result in a larger than typical payout.

"This is a textbook short squeeze," said Jochen Felsenheimer, a managing director at XAIA Investment.

Rather than offering investors a predetermined payout, CDS are designed to compensate holders for their expected loss on the defaulted bonds. Big banks that trade these derivatives, such as JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank, hold an auction to determine this payout.

In the first round of the Europcar auction, the rental car group's bonds were valued at 73 cents on the euro, which would have resulted in a 27 per cent payout to CDS holders. But the restricted supply of tradable debt meant there were more buyers than sellers in the second round, cutting compensation to nil. The outcome is particularly galling for investors that placed bets last year that Europcar's swaps would result in relatively high payouts. This was because, unusually, a €50m loan Credit Suisse provided to Europcar in 2019 was eligible for the CDS auction, which could have resulted in a higher payout.

But a group of hedge funds driving Europcar's restructuring, such as King Street Capital and Anchorage Capital, bought this loan from Credit Suisse in October, according to people familiar with the matter, meaning it was also subject to the trading lock-up.

While there was still more than enough debt outstanding to settle the swaps properly, not enough holders ultimately sold their bonds into the auction.

The farce marks the latest in a string of mishaps that have undermined confidence in CDS


Related Businesses
    - - Customer

    Copyright © 2024 by CreditRiskMonitor.com (Ticker: CRMZ®). All rights reserved.  You are not permitted to use this report or the information contained herein for any purpose not expressly permitted by CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. Except as expressly permitted by CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc., you are not permitted, in whole or in part, to copy, alter, correct, adapt, translate, enhance, lease, sell, sublicense, assign, distribute, publish, otherwise make available to any third party, or prepare derivative works or improvements of this report or any of the information contained therein. You are not permitted to reverse engineer, disassemble, decompile, decode, or adapt the software, algorithms or other processes used to prepare this report, or otherwise attempt to derive or gain access to the source code of same. You agree not to remove, alter, obscure, combine or otherwise change any disclaimers, trademarks, copyrights, other intellectual property rights, proprietary rights, or other symbols, notices, marks, or serial numbers on or relating to any copy of the report or on marketing or other materials that CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. may provide to you. You will not use this report in any manner or for any purpose that infringes, misappropriates, or otherwise violates any right of any party, or that violates any applicable law.  
    The FRISK® scores, agency ratings, credit limit recommendations and other scores, analysis and commentary are opinions of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. and/or its suppliers, not statements of fact, and should be one of several factors in making credit decisions.  Any reliance you place on the information in this report is strictly at your own risk. Except as expressly provided by CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc., no warranties or representations of any type, including without limitation of results to be obtained, merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, are made concerning any part of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc.’s service, including without limitation the FRISK® scores.  The information published above has been obtained from sources CreditRiskMonitor considers to be reliable.  CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. and its third-party suppliers do not guarantee or validate the accuracy and completeness of the information provided in this report, the underlying information input to create the FRISK® scores, and specifically do not assume responsibility for not reporting any information omitted or withheld.  By using this website, you accept the Terms of Use Agreement
    Contact Us: 845.230.3000
    Fundamental financial data concerning public companies may be provided by Refinitiv (click for restrictions)
    Friday, April 26, 2024