The corporate rebrands that missed the mark


Fiat Chrysler’s $50bn (£40bn) merger with PSA Group will create a new corporate entity called “Stellantis”, the carmakers announced on Wednesday, a word “rooted in the Latin verb ‘stello’ meaning to brighten with stars”.

The businesses added that the new title “draws inspiration from this new and ambitious alignment of storied automotive brands and strong company cultures that in coming together are creating one of the new leaders in the next era of mobility”.

It is not uncommon for companies to rebrand, to signify a change in the corporate culture of the company; the leadership team, to communicate a brand’s new vision and message. But some name changes are better than others. Here are some of the more interesting rebrands of the past few years.

Yahoo to Oath to Verizon Media Group

When Verizon Communications bought Yahoo in 2017, it announced that it would bring AOL (which it acquired in 2015) and Yahoo into a new subsidiary called Oath. Tim Armstrong, AOL’s chief executive at the time, tweeted “#TakeTheOath” to publicise the changes, but it didn’t take long for people to mock the plans online.

We are Oath. Launching Summer 2017. #TakeTheOath

— Oath (@vzoath) April 4, 2017

Tribune Publishing to Tronc

Tribune Publishing, which has a portfolio of US newspapers, changed its name in 2016 to Tronc – a diminutive of “Tribune online content” – to help reflect its step into the digital age. However, the change attracted a lot of criticism, and in 2018 it was revealed that Tronc would revert back to Tribune Publishing.

Dong Energy to Ørsted

In 2017, London-listed Danish firm Dong Energy rebranded to “Ørsted”, saying oil and gas was “no longer who we are”. The new name was in honour of the scientist Hans Christian Ørsted.

The identity change wasn’t without its obstacles, with descendents of Ørsted complaining of appropriation and launching a lawsuit.

Andersen Consulting to Accenture

The management and consultancy company rebranded after it cut off ties with accountancy firm Arthur Andersen and was ordered to change its name by a court.

It said the name had been chosen as Accenture demonstrates the company “putting an accent or emphasis on the future” but the $100m (£80m) rebranding, which was supposedly dreamt up by one of its Norwegian partners, was mocked for being meaningless.

Quindell to Watchstone

Insurance outsourcer Watchstone Group rebranded in 2015 to distance itself from its old name Quindell after it was caught up in a scandal where the company had dramatically overstated its revenues.

Matchtech to Gattaca

In 2016 engineering recruitment specialist Matchtech announced it would change its name to Gattaca, apparently not realising this was the name of a science-fiction film about eugenics.

Matchtech Group said its name change was to eliminate confusion about its different brands after the acquisition of an international recruitment company.

The 1997 film Gattacadepicts a not too distant future where people’s jobs are dependent on their genetic make-up, creating a divided society. Those without perfect DNA form an underclass and are only able to obtain menial jobs, with plum roles going to “perfect” specimens.

Smith & Wesson to American Outdoor Brands

The firearms manufacturer has been an iconic name since the American Civil War but that didn’t stop the company’s board changing the name in 2017 to American Outdoor Brands.

Although guns accounted for around 85pc of the company’s sales, it decided to accommodate a new range of outdoor products and future-proof itself from any changes in US legislation on gun ownership.

In November 2019, American Outdoor Brands said it would split into two companies: Smith & Wesson Brands, which would retain gun sales, and American Outdoor Brands. The company’s chairman cited changes in the political climate as part of the motivation for the move.

Isis Equity Partners to Livingbridge

The London private equity firm had to change its name in 2014 due to the rise in prominence of the terrorist organisation in the Middle East.

But Livingbridge is not the only company to rebrand due to the unfortunate coincidence. American e-wallet start-up Isis also changed its name to Softcard as it didn’t want its brand to be “synonymous with violence”, while Nasdaq-listed Isis Pharmaceuticals changed its name to Ionis Pharmaceuticals as it was trading under the ticker symbol “ISIS”.


Related Businesses
- - Customer

Copyright © 2024 by CreditRiskMonitor.com (Ticker: CRMZ®). All rights reserved.  You are not permitted to use this report or the information contained herein for any purpose not expressly permitted by CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. Except as expressly permitted by CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc., you are not permitted, in whole or in part, to copy, alter, correct, adapt, translate, enhance, lease, sell, sublicense, assign, distribute, publish, otherwise make available to any third party, or prepare derivative works or improvements of this report or any of the information contained therein. You are not permitted to reverse engineer, disassemble, decompile, decode, or adapt the software, algorithms or other processes used to prepare this report, or otherwise attempt to derive or gain access to the source code of same. You agree not to remove, alter, obscure, combine or otherwise change any disclaimers, trademarks, copyrights, other intellectual property rights, proprietary rights, or other symbols, notices, marks, or serial numbers on or relating to any copy of the report or on marketing or other materials that CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. may provide to you. You will not use this report in any manner or for any purpose that infringes, misappropriates, or otherwise violates any right of any party, or that violates any applicable law.  
The FRISK® scores, agency ratings, credit limit recommendations and other scores, analysis and commentary are opinions of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. and/or its suppliers, not statements of fact, and should be one of several factors in making credit decisions.  Any reliance you place on the information in this report is strictly at your own risk. Except as expressly provided by CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc., no warranties or representations of any type, including without limitation of results to be obtained, merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, are made concerning any part of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc.’s service, including without limitation the FRISK® scores.  The information published above has been obtained from sources CreditRiskMonitor considers to be reliable.  CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. and its third-party suppliers do not guarantee or validate the accuracy and completeness of the information provided in this report, the underlying information input to create the FRISK® scores, and specifically do not assume responsibility for not reporting any information omitted or withheld.  By using this website, you accept the Terms of Use Agreement
Contact Us: 845.230.3000
Fundamental financial data concerning public companies may be provided by Refinitiv (click for restrictions)
Monday, May 13, 2024