Are the Government’s arts grants just papering over the cracks?


So now we’re talking about the big bucks. The Cultural Recovery Fund’s latest injection of cash for arts institutionslaid low by the pandemic have awarded between £1 and £3million to 35 different organisations. It’s not yet what Oliver Dowden would call the “crown jewels” that are seeing the money (we will have to wait a week or more until we know what the future holds for the National Theatre, for example), but those in today’s announcement, such as Shakespeare’s Globe and Sadlers Wells, are big enough to get an impression of where it is all headed.

Essentially, many of the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport’s decisions here are sensible. 70 per cent of the funding has gone to organisations outside London, and combine both artistic excellence (Birmingham Rep, Manchester Royal Exchange) and the sort of venues that snide London-based arts editors like me rarely talk about (Birmingham Hippodrome and the ACC Liverpool Music Group). Most intriguing is the Mayflower Theatre Trust’s award of £3million. There is no doubt that this grant can go some way to supporting the infrastructure of a less wealthy city like Southampton and, who knows, possibly even help reopen the City’s Nuffield Theatres (one of the first victims of Covid, going into administration in May).

Inside the capital, some of the more generous handouts are rather harder to fathom. £3million for The Design Museum feels to me like a big reward for a place which to my mind has no permanent collection of any significance or indeed even a decent cafe. Similarly, Shakespeare’s Globe (awarded £2,985,707) has hardly been fleet of foot when it comes to survival. Bearing in mind that they are one of the few theatres in Britain with a big outdoor space, they could have made hay in the now seemingly halcyon days of July and August. Instead, they have waited until next month to unveil a series of socially distanced screenings.

A far worthier winner is the Old Vic (it’s worth noting that 17 out of 35 of the organisations awarded are theatres, an indication of how dire the predicament of this particular sector of the arts really is) which has shown resilience and innovation over the past few months with a string of well-received productions. Their £3million feels like an endorsement for a venue which has struggled to free itself from the shackles of the allegations of sexual harassment and assault against its former artistic director, actor Kevin Spacey. With no local authority funding or money from Arts Council England, the future could have been grim, but here, thankfully, they have been given a lifeline.

But as well as the matter of who deserves what, whether the money is going to the right places, I can’t help but feel that wider questions need to be asked. Is this money, for a lot of organisations, simply papering over the cracks? Thanks to furlough schemes, grants and various other measures, the storm has been weathered and things in the short term are looking a little brighter. But what about the mid-term? Unless we see a complete return to normality (not least with social distancing at an end), we could witness many places falling off a cliff in the next financial year.


Related Businesses
    - - Customer

    Copyright © 2024 by CreditRiskMonitor.com (Ticker: CRMZ®). All rights reserved.  You are not permitted to use this report or the information contained herein for any purpose not expressly permitted by CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. Except as expressly permitted by CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc., you are not permitted, in whole or in part, to copy, alter, correct, adapt, translate, enhance, lease, sell, sublicense, assign, distribute, publish, otherwise make available to any third party, or prepare derivative works or improvements of this report or any of the information contained therein. You are not permitted to reverse engineer, disassemble, decompile, decode, or adapt the software, algorithms or other processes used to prepare this report, or otherwise attempt to derive or gain access to the source code of same. You agree not to remove, alter, obscure, combine or otherwise change any disclaimers, trademarks, copyrights, other intellectual property rights, proprietary rights, or other symbols, notices, marks, or serial numbers on or relating to any copy of the report or on marketing or other materials that CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. may provide to you. You will not use this report in any manner or for any purpose that infringes, misappropriates, or otherwise violates any right of any party, or that violates any applicable law.  
    The FRISK® scores, agency ratings, credit limit recommendations and other scores, analysis and commentary are opinions of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. and/or its suppliers, not statements of fact, and should be one of several factors in making credit decisions.  Any reliance you place on the information in this report is strictly at your own risk. Except as expressly provided by CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc., no warranties or representations of any type, including without limitation of results to be obtained, merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, are made concerning any part of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc.’s service, including without limitation the FRISK® scores.  The information published above has been obtained from sources CreditRiskMonitor considers to be reliable.  CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. and its third-party suppliers do not guarantee or validate the accuracy and completeness of the information provided in this report, the underlying information input to create the FRISK® scores, and specifically do not assume responsibility for not reporting any information omitted or withheld.  By using this website, you accept the Terms of Use Agreement
    Contact Us: 845.230.3000
    Fundamental financial data concerning public companies may be provided by Refinitiv (click for restrictions)
    Tuesday, April 23, 2024